Page 1 of 1
oDC problems?
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:44 pm
by CrAzYfOoL
Does anyone else that uses oDC find that it just randomly closes? or is it just me
Would it make any difference if i swapped to DC++, seeing as they are both the same basic source code will it make a difference?
(just annoyed took me 6hrs to connect then oDC closed
)
cheers
-=CrAzY=-
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:49 pm
by BigG
I donn't know of any specific problems for oDC - I've used it a number of times before with no problems, although this was on a gigabit network
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:00 pm
by xyzzy
oDC is based on a very old version of DC++ and is not longer maintained, and does not support TTH hashing. You should really use the latest version of DC++, or try fulDC if you want something that looks pretty.
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:55 pm
by CrAzYfOoL
thanks xyzzy
much apreciated!
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:05 pm
by echelon
dont choose fulDC.. it has give a bit of problems..
oDC is still no longer under-development.. just to let everyone know..
also I would recommend BCDC++ currently if u want a "special" client for ur windows system
otherwise u could always get linux and use valknut
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:45 pm
by BigG
BCDC++ is just a modified version of DC++. It is not as stable so it is a much better idea to just use the 'standard' DC++ client. One of the reasons why oDC was/is used is because it doesn't have hashing implemented.
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:09 pm
by echelon
yes I realize that.. but often ppl ask why they have small problems with oDC and just making sure they realize its no longer being developed and is base on the old .306 version of DC++.. BCDC++ is based on the much newer 0.674 version and I would consider it just as stable as oDC.. Yet the /me command works in oDC, but not in BCDC
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:29 am
by Zeus
the /me command actually does work, its just it needs to be sent as RAW commend to openDC hubs... BigG's hub recommends them but cocodude's doesnt... so it clearly isn't a client issue.
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 6:32 pm
by BigG
The reason why it 'works' on my hub is because I hacked it
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:28 pm
by Zeus
that was meant to be a recognises them.... i get distrated too easily and write the wrong words down sex i mean... soo much to fuck... :p
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:55 pm
by echelon
which is why I keep telling cocodude to get VerliHub
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:33 am
by cocodude
echelon wrote:which is why I keep telling cocodude to get VerliHub
But then we wouldn't have Dogtanian!
Cocodude
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:40 pm
by echelon
yea but we'd have VerliHub
and also dogtanian was very naughty the other day and has upset tux!! his flipacoin answered in favour of windows twice.. It should never do that.. should be a built in bias that linux always wins!!
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:42 pm
by astropoint
Methinks complaining about that to BigG rather than Cocodude might be a better idea
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:26 am
by echelon
me thinks it was just a side-comment and not the main part of the message.. main part was to get cocodude to get VerliHub
BigG I'll handle at the LAN