Whitefields 17, Thursday 4:40 PM:
PING www.bbc.net.uk (212.58.224.111) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www11.thdo.bbc.co.uk (212.58.224.111): icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=13.5 ms
64 bytes from www11.thdo.bbc.co.uk (212.58.224.111): icmp_seq=2 ttl=242 time=39.2 ms
64 bytes from www11.thdo.bbc.co.uk (212.58.224.111): icmp_seq=3 ttl=242 time=45.3 ms
64 bytes from www11.thdo.bbc.co.uk (212.58.224.111): icmp_seq=4 ttl=242 time=100 ms
64 bytes from www11.thdo.bbc.co.uk (212.58.224.111): icmp_seq=5 ttl=242 time=52.3 ms
64 bytes from www11.thdo.bbc.co.uk (212.58.224.111): icmp_seq=6 ttl=242 time=51.9 ms
64 bytes from www11.thdo.bbc.co.uk (212.58.224.111): icmp_seq=7 ttl=242 time=68.3 ms
--- www.bbc.net.uk ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6005ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.596/52.992/100.133/24.668 ms
Test of Resnet Connection speed
Moderator: Operators
well, that's not quite enough.cocodude wrote:If someone has a bit of spare time, could they create a spreadsheet with this data (ping times, location, date, time of day)
i know that nobody wants to give too much away about themselves on this forum, but one of my theories is that ITS has made an error in restricting the subnets mentioned in the email.
so for locations, we need something more specific - not your room number, but for example,
instead of "Rootes", put "Rootes M"
instead of "Jack Martin" put "Jack Martin 3"
and so on...
In fact, me and anon101 were thinking about doing that spreadsheet when the thread was started. but we're not sure if we can make next week's focus group again.
Well if u make the spread sheet and someone else can make the meeting u could always send the spreadsheet to them.. that would still allow the information to be useful.. Also yes I think I agree about the on-campus ppl needing to be a bit more specific as it will allow the statistics to be more accurate... (yes everyone wants to be anonymous, but otherwise the data isnt worth as much)