oDC problems?

CrAzYfOoL · Post by **CrAzYfOoL** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:44 pm

Does anyone else that uses oDC find that it just randomly closes? or is it just me

Would it make any difference if i swapped to DC++, seeing as they are both the same basic source code will it make a difference?

(just annoyed took me 6hrs to connect then oDC closed

)

cheers

-=CrAzY=-

Post by **BigG** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:49 pm

I donn't know of any specific problems for oDC - I've used it a number of times before with no problems, although this was on a gigabit network

xyzzy · Post by **xyzzy** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:00 pm

oDC is based on a very old version of DC++ and is not longer maintained, and does not support TTH hashing. You should really use the latest version of DC++, or try fulDC if you want something that looks pretty.

CrAzYfOoL · Post by **CrAzYfOoL** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:55 pm

thanks xyzzy

much apreciated!

echelon · Post by **echelon** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:05 pm

dont choose fulDC.. it has give a bit of problems..

oDC is still no longer under-development.. just to let everyone know..

also I would recommend BCDC++ currently if u want a "special" client for ur windows system

otherwise u could always get linux and use valknut

Post by **BigG** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:45 pm

BCDC++ is just a modified version of DC++. It is not as stable so it is a much better idea to just use the 'standard' DC++ client. One of the reasons why oDC was/is used is because it doesn't have hashing implemented.

echelon · Post by **echelon** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:09 pm

yes I realize that.. but often ppl ask why they have small problems with oDC and just making sure they realize its no longer being developed and is base on the old .306 version of DC++.. BCDC++ is based on the much newer 0.674 version and I would consider it just as stable as oDC.. Yet the /me command works in oDC, but not in BCDC

Zeus · Post by **Zeus** » Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:29 am

the /me command actually does work, its just it needs to be sent as RAW commend to openDC hubs... BigG's hub recommends them but cocodude's doesnt... so it clearly isn't a client issue.

Post by **BigG** » Sun Jan 22, 2006 6:32 pm

The reason why it 'works' on my hub is because I hacked it

Zeus · Post by **Zeus** » Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:28 pm

that was meant to be a recognises them.... i get distrated too easily and write the wrong words down sex i mean... soo much to fuck... :p

echelon · Post by **echelon** » Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:55 pm

which is why I keep telling cocodude to get VerliHub

Post by **cocodude** » Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:33 am

echelon wrote:which is why I keep telling cocodude to get VerliHub

But then we wouldn't have Dogtanian!

Cocodude

echelon · Post by **echelon** » Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:40 pm

yea but we'd have VerliHub

and also dogtanian was very naughty the other day and has upset tux!! his flipacoin answered in favour of windows twice.. It should never do that.. should be a built in bias that linux always wins!!

Post by **astropoint** » Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:42 pm

Methinks complaining about that to BigG rather than Cocodude might be a better idea

echelon · Post by **echelon** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:26 am

me thinks it was just a side-comment and not the main part of the message.. main part was to get cocodude to get VerliHub

BigG I'll handle at the LAN